Should We Embrace Nature as a God?

Can treating nature as a God be a solution to the problems of the climate crisis, or is that likely to cause even more problems? Peter Sjöstedt-Hughes, Tim Palmer, and Melanie Challenger discuss. Hosted by philosopher Hilary Lawson.

This post is part of a partnership with the Institute of Art and Ideas. This video was originally published here.

Previous articleProfessors as Teachers: Criteria for Awarding Tenure
Next articleCharles Mills: On Seeing and Naming the Whiteness of Philosophy

2 COMMENTS

  1. I suggest we begin to re-cognize LIFE as a phenomenon. It includes human life. but is much, much more inclusive, and respecting LIFE while taking seriously our present place within the Biosphere as we approach 8 billion will lead to a different position than simply “protecting the human fetus.” Study the astounding complexity of biology, beyond the reductionism of physics. There is deep continuity among the life processes of all living organisms—and they all DO “strive to stay alive”—that’s what drives evolution. So far, LIFE remains an embarrassingly under-theorized phenomenon. That needs to change.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here