This post is a part of the Blog's 2023 APA Conference coverage, showcasing the research of APA members across the country. The Society for Business panel will be taking place at the APA Central Conference from 2–4 p.m. on Saturday, February 25.
While “diversity” has an almost reflexively positive valence in most contexts, diversity in business merits careful analysis. Most major U.S. businesses are for-profit corporations that are obliged to produce a return for shareholders. Where does diversity fit in? May/must corporations promote diversity even if it harms the bottom line? Could promoting diversity ever be self-undermining, by tokenizing minorities or reinforcing existing power structures? And what, for that matter, is diversity in business? In which form, if any, does it merit institutional support?
As co-representatives for the Society for Business Ethics in the 2023, 2024, and 2025 meetings of the Central APA, Mihailis Diamantis (Iowa) and Gregory Robson (Iowa State, Notre Dame) have brought together business ethicists to examine “The Meaning and Value of Diversity in Business.” Diamantis is thanked for special help with this year’s panel. What follows is a brief preview of the talks. We hope that they will foster productive discussion and debate about the meaning and relevance of diversity for business.
In “The Vacuity of Diversity,” John Hasnas (Georgetown) will argue that in the business realm, diversity is interesting only when it is irrelevant. It has long been known and accepted that there is value in diversity of thought. The value of diversity becomes interesting only when it refers to demographic diversity. But then it is irrelevant to businesses, because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act makes it illegal to base any employment decisions on such considerations. Regardless of whether demographic diversity produces better performance, greater profitability, or any other social benefit, businesses cannot legally hire on the basis of applicant race, sex, or other protected demographic characteristics.
In “On Valuing Women,” Lauren Kaufmann (Virginia) will interrogate the epistemic assumptions underlying the business case for diversity, arguing that these assumptions have the potential to strengthen the organizational structures that have historically excluded and undervalued women in business. Kaufmann will present coauthored work on intersectionality, demonstrating that a genuine value theory of diversity requires first recognizing and dismantling structural barriers that perpetuate inequities instead of merely adding “diverse” bodies to the same organizational structure. This work aims to help managers identify and deconstruct structural barriers to women’s inclusion, offering a new path toward intersectional gender justice in the workplace.
In “Gender Bias in Performance Evaluations” (coauthored in the Journal of Economic Psychology), Albena Neschen (FOM University) will consider state-mandated gender quotas on corporate boards. The intention behind such quotas is to close the gender gap in economic participation and help promote women within organizations. A broader literature on affirmative action policies, such as quotas, indicates they may do more harm than good for their intended beneficiaries. Neschen will investigate whether quotas for women have direct negative effects on performance evaluations and hence reinforce existing gender bias. She will present the results of empirical and experimental research in Europe.
In “Mandating Diversity on the Board of Directors” (coauthored in the Journal of Business Ethics), Jessica Rixom (Nevada-Reno) will also discuss state-imposed gender diversity on corporate boards. She will present an experiment in which she investigated how state-imposed gender quotas affect investor perceptions of female board member tokenism. She will argue that quota mandates have the power to shift social expectations regarding female representation by increasing the critical mass needed to overcome perceptions of tokenism which in turn affects investment dollars. As a consequence, corporations must not only meet, but exceed, any quota mandate to capture the benefits with investors of a diverse board.
We hope that this panel at the Central APA will provide interesting forays into issues of corporate purpose, corporate virtue, and CSR. The meaning, nature, and value of diversity in business is widely studied, but far from fully understood. We aim to provoke a productive discussion for all! Disagreements from diverse perspectives welcome. Please join us to engage our panelists.