ResearchWhat Are You Reading...On Justice

What Are You Reading…On Justice

In the wake of the Muller report, I have seen many debates about what constitutes “obstruction of justice.” Some, like our Attorney General, argue that it requires intentionally trying to stop what one perceives to be a legitimate inquiry (thus Barr’s claim that no obstruction occurred because the president had reason to believe the special counsel’s investigation was a witch hunt). Others say the perception part is unimportant, but that there did need to be intent to stop a legitimate inquiry. Still others argue that intention is irrelevant, as all that matters is whether a reasonable person could anticipate that their action would result in obstruction. In addition, there have been arguments over what counts as an lawful challenge to one’s opponents vs. an underhanded, if not illegal, tactic.

Now would be a good time for the media to initiate a discussion over the definition of justice more broadly. There are many different theories (retributive, restorative, distributive, etc.) and many different applications (criminal, civil, social, political, etc.) of it. I imagine lots of people go through life using the idea of justice they inherited from their family/friends, or following what their emotional/psychological makeup says. But given how important the concept is to every aspect of our lives, it is imperative that everyone consider what attitude we want our society to have towards it. Luckily, many theorists are still writing papers considering how justice should work. Here are some examples.

*

Have a suggestion for the What Are You Reading column? Contact us here.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield

Topics

Advanced search

Posts You May Enjoy

Brent Hoff’s “The Love Competition”

0. I will discuss here a short documentary movie, Brent Hoff’s “The Love Competition.” First, I will summarize the movie. (§1) Then, I will lay...