Work/Life BalanceAPA Member Interview: Desheng Zong

APA Member Interview: Desheng Zong

Desheng Zong is a professor of Philosophy at the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics as well as the East China Normal University.  He became interested in philosophy after reading Russell and Wittgenstein and earned his PhD from Tulane University. Currently, his research interests include possible worlds theories of content and philosophy of action in the Aristotelian-Anscombean framework.

What excites you about philosophy?

I was on a red-eye flight back to the U.S. after a four-month overseas stay. In the wee hours after meal service I went to the back of the plane to purchase a drink.  I ended up having a conversation with the flight attendant who served me the bourbon.  “What you do for living?” he asked.  “I’m a philosopher,” I said.  “Get out here!” he said, handing me the drink and laughing.

What are you working on right now?

I’m currently working on action theory.  I’m pursuing a research agenda inspired by what I call the “triple A theory of action” — the tradition in the study of intentional action championed by Aristotle, Aquinas, and Anscombe.  It’s my belief that the causalist tradition, which has dominated the philosophy of action in the past forty plus years, is a research paradigm ill-conceived from the very start.  Actions, in my view, are entities in the class I call “rational order of things,” they’re not physical events plus x, regardless how that x is spelled out.  The time has come for us to question the dominant view and return to the rich tradition represented by the three A’s.

If you could be someone else for a day, who would that be and why?

It would have to be Gareth Evans.  Evans is one of those philosophers I call “trench philosophers.”  Just like soldiers in the trench in World War I who had to deal with issues not of their own picking but issues they were confronted with and from which there was no escape — flooding, rodent problem, enemy artillery, living in close quarters to the sick, the dead, and the decaying, etc., the issues trench philosophers deal with are not issues that they “come to work on,” as Donald Davidson said of how he got into working on action, but are issues that they have no choice but respond to because they are being overrun by them.

What do you like to do outside work?

I skateboard a lot, pretty much everyday, and I would like to call myself a skateboarder.  If I could turn the clock back twenty years, I’d definitely be grinding ledgers and rails, in which case I would most definitely not be doing what I’m doing now.  My current goal is to ollie down a five set.   

What are you reading now? Would you recommend it?

I just finished reading Killers of the Flower Moon by David Grann and I’m currently half way through a new biography of Ulysses Grant by Ron Chernow.  I highly recommend these two books.

*

This section of the APA Blog is designed to get to know our fellow philosophers a little better. We’re including profiles of APA members that spotlight what captures their interest not only inside the office, but also outside of it. We’d love for you to be a part of it, so please contact us via the interview nomination form here to nominate yourself or a friend.

Skye C. Cleary PhD MBA is a philosopher and author of How to Be Authentic: Simone de Beauvoir and the Quest for Fulfillment (2022), Existentialism and Romantic Love (2015) and co-editor of How to Live a Good Life (2020). She was a MacDowell Fellow (2021), awarded the 2021 Stanford Calderwood Fellowship, and won a New Philosopher magazine Writers’ Award (2017). She teaches at Columbia University and the City College of New York and is former Editor-in-Chief of the APA Blog.

1 COMMENT

  1. I’m happy to learn that there is another philosopher besides myself who is working on action theory and also skateboards! Alas, however, I’m a causalist, but one who is working to revise it by urging a shift towards a powers metaphysic.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield

Topics

Advanced search

Posts You May Enjoy

How to Save Honesty in Human Subject Research

In human subject research, we often face an ethical question: is it ever justifiable to deceive participants? After all, deception can be effective in...